Talk:Eshref Ademaj

Wiesel wording/neutrality
The name of the settlement of birth was in 1940 Žur, and is the same per WP:AT. Serbia was a part of FR Yugoslavia and I see no source to corroborate the myth that unilateral measures by Serbia were against the policies of the central government. The FRY was led by its government, the only article that even broaches the subject of this body is the brief final paragraph on Parliament of Yugoslavia. To that end, how the hell can Milošević regime be neutral? Is there anything the matter with government or administration? Can it not be said that Milošević steered the country despite not being its president? And the person behind one so-called "account" has the audustity to accuse me of "attempting to mislead" when all I did was spell the full truth - something damaging for super POV-pushers. Right now the article looks like Serbia was a country which it wasn't, and Milošević was head of government, which he wasn't. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 23:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The article has been reviewed by Blofeld during the DYK process and he didn't find any misrepresentation of the sources. If you want another review take it to RSN/NORN. Kostovicova throughout the cited chapter uses the term "Serbian policy" etc. That being said, "Milosevic regime" is a mainstream term used by many sources to describe the regime of that era i.e. the early 1990s, Milosevic's regime in Belgrade proved even ...-- — ZjarriRrethues — talk 14:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Mainstream sources also say "dictator" but we are writing an encyclopaedia, not a tabloid news report. The translation of his name is biographical information to alert readers how it was written in the country where he lived out his life and is consistent with all persons born in Serbia. DYK is not a licence on ownership nor is the green light to assume the article may not be edited. I have cleaned the page up and inserted correct titles and links for the subjects mentioned. I contend tat my version is more encyclopaedic than the previous which is contrived to deceive and push POV and can easily hoodwink persons not versed in FRY affairs of the day. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)