Talk:Evil Con Carne

Untitled
Doesn't "Evil Con Carne" mean literally "Evil With Meat"? --Geopgeop 17:28, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Sure does!--Bltpdx 07:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about the minor character deletion; I probably should have been more judicious but the character descriptions were a bit informal and I thought it better to delete them rather than edit them with inaccurate information.--Bltpdx 21:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Stub?
How is this a stub? Does it have to have a full episode guide before gaining article status? Cleanup, editing, wikified, character list, plot overview, history of the show...what are we missing? I've removed the "stub" status, but am willing to be convinced otherwise.--Bltpdx 06:48, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Or...maybe that stub has been here the whole time, and I just never noticed. Sorry about that, anybody who was offended...--Bltpdx 06:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

..why must everyone on wikipedia link every single year and month??.. its not like anyone goes to 'evil con carne' and thinks 'ooh, let me remember what 2003 was'

What happened to Hector and Major Doctor Ghastly after the entertainment corporation bought up Bunny Island and then Mandy bought it off them or whatever?

Anon

New Look?
Just checking if I'm insane here, but didn't the show's look get an update like halfway through the season? Should we add this in the history section(If there even is one anymore)?? The new look was brighter so the technique wasn't identical to Billy & Mandy. I've been looking for a picture forever to check this but dang it there's nothing on the whole net!! I'm not totally sure exactly what episode it was that it was changed, but I'm guessing it was either No No Nanuk/Teenage Idol or Mother of all Evils/The HCCBDD. If anyone happens to find some concept art for the characters in their "new looks" please send a link. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.195.139.139 (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Evil Con Carne.gif
Image:Evil Con Carne.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)