Talk:Extinct isotopes of superheavy elements

244Pu detection
Although scientific evidence might be sky high, the prove to the presence of 244Pu outside the laboratory - and especially in Gy old samples - is only circumstantial. The use of the verbs in the article suggest a real detection in those old samples. I just don't know how to rephrase the sentences to express the evidence is overwhelming but without saying 244Pu was there.T.vanschaik (talk) 08:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The evidence is actually even higher, since we have found live 244Pu of interstellar origin (from the r-process in nearby supernovae) on Earth. What I do wonder is how Pu is relevant to this article, as it's not superheavy; if it is to remain, perhaps "transuranium" is better, and then we should also consider extinct 247Cm. Double sharp (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

validity?
So far, I haven't seen any really good info on this topic and it feels like a bunch of unreliably info gathered by folks trying to make The Next Big Things. Should we subsume this page into another or delete? 2601:CA:8280:880:349C:48E1:9F9:4139 (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)