Talk:FAI Gliding Commission

Fair use rationale for Image:IGC (4A) 120.jpg
Image:IGC (4A) 120.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Split of FAI Gliding Commission Badges
I suggest that FAI Gliding Commission Badges are split into their own article. They have their own article on pl wikipedia (pl:Odznaka Szybowcowa), they seem notable as a separate entity, and could be more properly categorized and assessed in such a form. Thoughts? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 16:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What else could be added? JMcC (talk) 17:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Better structure. Even now the article if split would be start class, not stub, so it's good for stand alone performance. And I am sure more content could be added by experts on the subject. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 04:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

NeutralSupport I can't think why not, but it isn't keeping me awake! Obviously the links to do with badges would have to be manually adjusted, but there are not too many of those. Would the records stay with the IGC article or would they go with badges? Categorise as Category:Sports trophies and awards and Category:Gliding. JMcC (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The records should stay or be split into their own list. What about Awards? Should we move them to badges? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 19:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I would move the awards with the badges and eventually move the records to a separate article. Perhaps the article should be FAI Gliding Commission Badges and Awards JMcC (talk) 08:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Decline split request per WP:WHENSPLIT. The section sits appropriately within the article, so a summary would need to be left behind, and as there is not a significantly large amount of material in the section, there is no reason to split per Size.  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  22:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FAI Gliding Commission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205015245/http://records.fai.org/gliding/ to http://records.fai.org/gliding/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)