Talk:Facial tissue

article in reality talking only about situation in USA? and other issues
In my country in Europe tissue paper handkerchiefs definitely are NOT mainly sold in boxes – these boxes with their annoyingly flimsy contents, in my opinion not suitable for blowing ones nose, much too thin!, started to appear relatively recently and I do not see them overtaking the handy little (until now usually plastic, but some extra eco-friendly ones are made from AND packed in recycled paper) packs of (most often ten) folded, strong enough for sneezing and blowing ones nose, real paper-hankies at all in any near future. Also "Kleenex" is NOT a term widely used here (there is another brand name that has become generalised as meaning all paper-hankies here).

By the way: "facial tissue" – is this really the term for these objects? It sounds like meaning the flesh, skin etc. of human faces, and in the categories section there in fact IS one BIOLOGY related... hmmm... That section about "segmentation" containing only three terms, all red-linked, seems to make no sense, by the way... Readers can GUESS that this may be some producers- or marketing firms-thing, but do you fellow wikipedians really think that is relevant, and should at all be explained soon, instead of just, as I'd find justified, be thrown out?

And does that list of companies make sense? Which sense? I think, if it does, the reason should be given there, inside the article/ section. I always welcome to be corrected :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3032:5:D393:1:1:6D22:51CD (talk) 08:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)