Talk:Fasciolopsis

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Cleaning up mess
This article is about an important parasite, but it is a mess, with misstatements and bad writing. I have had a hurried go at cleaning out the worst embarrassments, but I am no parasitologist and IMO it needs a decent rewrite. At least I removed Fascioloides (Fasciolopsis magna ), which has been hanging in there since April 2010!  JonRichfield (talk) 16:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)