Talk:Fellsilent

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled[edit]

I wish to have extended time in which to edit the article to a point where it has filled the necessary requirements.Omeggia (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have clearly stated the topic's importance and have mentioned the aspects that make it encyclopaedia notable, I request it be unconsidered for speedy deletion.Omeggia (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The band fails to meet the standards of WP:BAND. (GregJackP (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Any recommendations on how I can improve the article so it does meet the standards of WP:BAND would be most welcome before deletion is carried out.Omeggia (talk) 02:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The band is under record label Sumerian Records and has released two albums under the label.Omeggia (talk) 04:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The band is under record label Sumerian Records and has released two albums under the label. As is stated by No. 5 of WP:BAND "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)."It shall prevail (talk) 04:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As is said above.Omeggia (talk) 04:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article as it stands provides no independent varification for any material. There are no reviews, evidence of album sales, evidence of performances at notable events, and when the label website is viewed, the section in Fellsilent is over a year out of date. As it stands the article does not provide evidence of notability. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 15:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even the material on the wikipedia page is well out of date

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fellsilent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606081954/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=105951 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=105951

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]