Talk:Feral Tribune

Trainwreck
This article is a trainwreck. Why? The two largest sections of it have barely any citations. Also, I get the vibe of a romanticized portrayal of the magazine. Is this really something you would find in an encyclopedia? How is Wikipedia supposed to be taken seriously with articles like this? Please, clean this rubbish dump up. Timbouctou or whoever. This is coming from someone who read the weekly magazine for years. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.207.82.196 (talk) 12:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Feral Tribune. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721095339/http://ww.booksa.hr/vijesti/5/1902 to http://ww.booksa.hr/vijesti/5/1902
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721101013/http://knjiga.hr/06.asp?param=F&stranica=2&provjera=nav&ID=386 to http://knjiga.hr/06.asp?param=F&stranica=2&provjera=nav&ID=386
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://tacno.net/zagreb/snjezana-kordic-feral-je-perfekcija-na-svim-razinama/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)