Talk:Filipino Globe

Untitled
i believe that this content is purely informational and completely verifiable and does not solicit or promote a brand, product or service. it is consistent with the style, presentation and neutrality of articles on similar topics (please see south china morning post and hong kong standard). applying the standards of common sense, it's quite plain to see that the article has no pretenses. if anything, it suffers from a lack of detail, which may be updated when more verifiable information comes to hand. i sincerley hope you will reconsider the db-spam classification on this entry


 * fair enough Seb az86556 (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

re: lack of independent confirmation of notability: i believe that the publication qualifies as a notable source of news material by having been cited as the source of articles by notbale publications (hong kong standard and gma news tv, both of which are already cited in wikipedia). given. references to the aforementioned media entities have been added. therefore, may i request that you reconsider deletion of Filipino Globe for the reason given (lack of independent confirmation of notability). thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BuzzTian (talk • contribs) 12:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)