Talk:Fire-resistance rating

Fire-resistance rating
An unregistered user made reference to a new tunnel fire time/temperature curve used by TNO. He or she also stated that TNO and Effectis are now the same thing. It would be helpful to see some evidence of both of those two assertions. If the unidentified user can provide an excel file with the temperature data, I can then incorporate this into the graph that is shown on this site. It would be best to have all curves on one. It's easy enough to do in excel, but I need the data. --Achim 01:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

OK, I just received the back-up from a friend in the NL. The changes were absolitely on the level, in both respects! Nice addition! --Achim 04:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Picture 1...Picture 2...Picture N
I'm not schooled in details of the process pictures 1-7 are illustrating, but surely each step has an actual name? While it provides handy little subsection edit links, using "Picture N" as a header line doesn't add much useful information to either the TOC or the subsections they identify. I'd suggest either finding the actual in-use names of the stages, or changing the header lines to use bold instead of ====Picture N==== --Short Circuit (talk) 15:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * agreed, I think bold more than works for it until a name is given for each if that can be done. However does anyone know how to handle the formatting so the pictures still match up. Persoanlly i think it is unnecsssary to show this many photos even. Ottawa4ever (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I plan on editing this article in regards to (1) the "how to" nature of the information conveyed in the pictures, (2) the excessive wording of the captions should be incorporated into the article's text, and (3) the extraneous pictures which do not contribute materially to the understanding of the article's content (e.g., the point of the last picture?). Comments? Kilmer-san (talk) 04:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I support going ahead with that, the whole section just doesnt flow for what a wiki article is suppose to be. Ottawa4ever (talk) 07:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)