Talk:Foreign aid to Pakistan

Mechanics and grammar
The mechanics of this article are atrocious. I have neither the time nor the interest to clean up this particular piece, but somebody who specializes in international aid should devote some time to making basic grammatical corrections.

What? Error?
"United Kingdom has pledged £n/a million to Pakistan from 2009-2013.[17]"

Fixed it, source said 665 Million, so I put that in.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Foreign aid to Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091018182109/http://www.ifespakistan.org/esg/index.htm to http://ifespakistan.org/esg/index.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304115417/http://www.app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=87626&Itemid=2 to http://www.app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=87626&Itemid=2
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221161306/http://islamabad.usembassy.gov/ to http://islamabad.usembassy.gov/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080928101649/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008%5C09%5C10%5Cstory_10-9-2008_pg7_18 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008%5C09%5C10%5Cstory_10-9-2008_pg7_18

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Trump's Comments and Update
It seems like there should be some updating to the page. Trump has made comments more than once on Pakistan losing funding. Why has this been left off the page? 125.25.20.84 (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 11 March 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move  (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Foreign aid to Pakistan → Foreign funding to Pakistan – When following Pakistan's news sources related to International Women's Day demonstrations called Aurat March, I realized that the contemporary wording used in South Asia in general and Pakistan in particular, used is 'funding' instead of 'aid'. I do have two purposes here 1) To know whether to continue with with word 'aid' only or word 'funding' is better one? 2) Since any way some of you will join the discussion, I want to know community inclination about, whether it is better to include debates over institutional i.e. private and NGOs funding in same article or it is better to come up with independent article? Bookku (talk) 07:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Oppose It may violate WP:NPOV if moved to the requested/proposed titled. Moreover, most of the RS sources refer to "aid" not "funding". Also, the proposed title may introduce bias. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)