Talk:Four Trials

Fair use rationale for Image:Four Trials book cover.jpg
Image:Four Trials book cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

"Alleged" removed
-->[[User:Dae|Dae]) I removed the word "alleged" because the court ruled in this particular case for a 25 million dollar judgement and WAS CONSIDERING punititive damages when they decided to settle for 25 million. There's no ambiguity about guilt in this particular case. The jury ruled on it, it could of been even worse for them.  If you question my source it's available here http://www.monkeytime.org/lakey.html  and i'm quoting ...[Edwards] discovered that 12 other children had suffered similar injuries from Sta-Rite drains. The company raised its offer to $1.25 million. Two weeks into the trial, they upped the figure to $8.5 million. Edwards declined the offer and asked for their insurance policy limit of $22.5 million. The day before the trial resumed from Christmas break, Sta-Rite countered with $17.5 million. Again, Edwards said no...the jury found Sta-Rite guilty and liable for $25 million in economic damages (by state law, punitive damages could have tripled that amount). The company immediately settled for $25 million, the largest verdict in state history.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.229.26 (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)