Talk:Francoise Baylis

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.amap.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=65&Itemid=62. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest disclosure
Edits by Tm806891 were provided while working as a Bioethics Research Associate for Novel Tech Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University. Tm806891 (talk) 14:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Tm806891 was (at the time of writing) a contract employee of Novel Tech Ethics, a Bioethics research team which was founded and is lead by Françoise Baylis.Tm806891 (talk) 14:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

This entry is about an interesting and noteworthy person, but it reads as though it was written by one of her grad students, which apparently it was for the most part. The tone suggests the writer was constantly mindful of how the boss might feel about her entry. In this respect, it fails Wikipedia's objectivity standards. Kempt Head (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)