Talk:Free Music Archive

2009 discussion over FMU article deletion
In 2009 deletion incentive - 'discussion' resulted with just two opinions to merge with WFMU...

...meanwhile FMA article is notable on its own. This is just to add context to this. --Zblace (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

CSD
This may fall under G11 and not G4, but I don't know whether this is an exact recreation or not.

Speedy Deletion
Please do not delete, in the process of updating the page to make it fit with wikipeida's standards. Sorry!

Kevinrbing (talk) 02:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The problem is, with the site being only 5 days old, it is very hard to indicate why that website is important or significant. Please review WP:WEB for the notability requirements for web content.    If this site survives the notability criteria the please add third party references to substantiate that.    Thanks.  JCutter (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I contend that the site is notable for a variety of reasons 1 - It hosts 5,000 podsafe free tracks for use 2 - Has received substantive media attention from the respected news website cnet.com http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10217017-2.html and prefixmag.com http://www.prefixmag.com/news/free-music-archive-launches/27708/ 3 - Is officially associated with the New York State Music fund and free form radio station WFMU.
 * Alternatively, if you think this reasoning is kind of weak I would be in favor of merging this article with WFMU
 * Kevinrbing (talk) 03:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Stats in 2017
As of now: So, 12448 Tracks, more than 10 percent of total, are usable for commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Freemusicarchive.org. --Atlasowa (talk) 10:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 113.166 Tracks total
 * 3031 Tracks with CC-BY-SA licence
 * 7275 Tracks with CC-BY licence
 * 2142 Tracks in Public Domain
 * 624 Tracks with CC-BY-ND licence
 * 8640 Tracks with CC-BY-NC licence
 * 44857 Tracks with CC-BY-SA-NC licence
 * 43115 Tracks with CC-BY-ND-NC licence