Talk:Fuller House (TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fuller House (TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Fuller House (TV series) was copied or moved into List of Fuller House episodes with this edit on January 5, 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

February 21 to 27, 2016 (8th)
February 28 to March 5, 2016 (14th)

“You calling a source unreliable does not make it so”[edit]

Calling something that isn’t a plot hole a plot hole doesn’t make it so. In fact doing so goes against the very definition of the phrase. They explained Michelle’s absence all the way back in episode 1, and the reasoning still applies in season 4--Fradio71 (talk) 06:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel? Spin-off?[edit]

I have no problem with either term, nor do I have a problem using both terms in the article (as it currently does). However, "sequel" is used in the lead, the categories, once in the main text, and 3 times in the sources, while "spin-off" is in the main text twice and in the sources 20 times. So, with the weight of that, shouldn't it be "spin-off" in the lead and categories instead? --Musdan77 (talk) 03:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We should be consistent in the article. If the majority of sources, weighted highest towards the ones closest to NETFLIX, call it a spin-off then that is what the article should call it in all instances where this needs a classification. I don't want to get into editor evaluations of the meanings of the terms as everyone will have good reason to call it what they think is correct, so most common usage in sources should be determinative. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Calling it not a sequel at all would still be wrong though--Fradio71 (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly a sequel, not a spin-off. Spin-off usually has just loose connections to main show/movie.--Denniss (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's inevitable for people give an opinion on which they think is better. I'm not sure what you mean by "ones closest to NETFLIX". Netflix itself doesn't use either one. Of the 3 uses of the terms in the article, only one has a reference at the end of the sentence, and it has "spinoff" in the source (WWD.com). Musdan77 (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant by closest to NETFLIX is to find out what they consider it as being more informative than what some random reviewer calls it unless the reviewers have a consensus opinion. However, given the description in the article, sequel looks a better match than spin-off (media). We could also try to avoid classifying it at all in the article and just go by the descriptions. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending revisions[edit]

Why are my revisions under review? What did I do wrong?--Fradio71 (talk) 18:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fradio71: The article is under pending changes protection, which means IP edits can still be made but someone with pending review privileges would need to approve the IP's edit (most readers will not see any changes made by the IP, prior to approval, if they come across the article at this point). An IP edit was made before yours, and because of that IP edit, it remains "pending" until approved by someone with pending review privileges. I just approved the edits made by the IP and you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lori Loughlin[edit]

Why is there no mention of Lori Loughlin being fired because of that college admissions scandal? Cincinnati resident (talk) 02:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because there are just rumors but nothing official. --Denniss (talk) 07:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No it actually did happen. It isn't rumors. Cincinnati resident (talk) 03:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should be able to source it using a source which isn't based on those rumors. --Denniss (talk) 08:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did the section about Lori Loughlin get removed? There was a source! Cincinnati resident (talk) 03:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a source if it backtracks to the rumors I mentioned above. --Denniss (talk) 05:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why is she not on there?

Cincinnati resident (talk) 00:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and nominations[edit]

I've just trimmed this section in accordance with guidelines. Only awards for the series belong here. Awards for the actors belong at the respective actor pages, if they exist. Amaury • 15:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2020[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Since You Said That Jason Marsden Originally Played Nelson You didn't Put That The actor that Played Harry Was Nathan Nishigutchi And You Should About The Actor That Played Nelson And Harry Were Recasted 2601:981:C201:5230:1077:BBE7:F333:AF8 (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I can't understand what you're asking exactly. In any case, changes like this would need reliable source(s) to support them. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]