Talk:Gödel's Loophole

Kegler article
User:Jeffreykegler did a bunch of research about this some years back, and wrote it up here:

https://jeffreykegler.github.io/personal/morgenstern.html

The IAS document mentioned there is the write-up by Oskar Morgenstern that is cited in the article, though according to Jeffrey Kegler's page, it turned up in 2006. 2601:648:8200:970:0:0:0:1A5F (talk) 08:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't think that Kegler's GitHub page qualifies as a reliable source, but I'll take a look at it in case it leads me to something else that is. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, already I see, in the 4th paragraph, a factual error: the examination took place in Trenton, not in Princeton. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Entrenched Clauses
The loophole could relate to the fact that Article V appears to allow entrenched clauses, i.e. unamendable amendments. There is already an entrenched clause in that no amendment may deprive a state of equal representation in the Senate. The Crittenden Amendments and the Corwin Amendment, both proposed right before the Civil War, but never ratified, would have basically entrenched slavery forever. Piltdown Mann (talk) 19:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)