Talk:GRUNK

Request move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

GRUNK → Royal Government of National Union of Kampuchea – Official names are should be used for articles about historic states. --Relisted. walk victor falktalk 23:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)   --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)  Britannic124 (talk) 00:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment The nominator's rationale is flawed, GRUNK is not a former historical state, that would be Kingdom of Cambodia (1975-76) walk victor falktalk 04:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. If the acronym is better known then it should probably be used. Even if the full name is used it should be Royal Government of the National Union of Kampuchea, which is the natural English. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Support move to "Royal Government of the National Union of Kampuchea". Coreyemotela (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC).


 * Oppose It's a perfectly cromulent acronym per WP:ACRONYMTITLE and WP:TITLEFORMAT. I think people are just a little jarred in the lack of decorum a (royal no less!) government something as prosaic as "grunk". It is the wp:commonname as shown by wp:rs and wp:v sources. walk victor falktalk 23:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - relatively impenetrable and obscure acronym. Gouvernement royal d'union nationale du Kampuchéa should really be with "the" as User:Necrothesp. Grunk could mean anything and fails WP:CRITERIA to this User at least. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * So do nato and nasa. <sup style="color:green;">walk <i style="color:green;">victor falk</i><i style="color:green;">talk</i> 02:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.