Talk:GaYbor

Comment
Anyone with good info on this burgeoning district is encouraged to edit, don't worry about going over what I wrote.Blaze33541 (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

If it can be confirmed
I read in a paper somewhere how GaYbor has been a 'shot in the arm' for the local economy, a real money maker. If anyone can confirm this, it should be added in. And the fact that members of the coalition are all types of sexual identities should be higher up in the article, not last. Lots42 (talk) 16:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GaYbor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070702202709/http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/SameSexCouplesandGLBpopACS.pdf to http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/SameSexCouplesandGLBpopACS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)