Talk:Gaara/GA1

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "Naruto Shippūden: Gekitou Ninja Taisen EX marks the first appearance of Gaara in his Part II appearance in a video game, with the second one being Naruto Shippūden: Narutimate Accel." Lose an appearance.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I'm assuming there's no less commercial place to demonstrate the availability of merchandise than Amazon.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * One weak piece of prose shouldn't hold this back; I'm sure it will be fixed directly. Jclemens (talk) 02:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed the line of prose. sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 06:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I meant the fact that the word appearance was used twice in rapid succession--once for the character's costuming, and once for the occurrence. Jclemens (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * One weak piece of prose shouldn't hold this back; I'm sure it will be fixed directly. Jclemens (talk) 02:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed the line of prose. sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 06:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I meant the fact that the word appearance was used twice in rapid succession--once for the character's costuming, and once for the occurrence. Jclemens (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)