Talk:Gabriel Liiceanu

Revolution?
Can somebody explain why is Liiceanu included in the category "People of the Romanian Revolution of 1989" and which are the sources to support that?--MariusM 20:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

"Andreescu Critique" Legitimacy
The section, first and foremost, should not be a 'section'. It should, at most, be integrated somewhere in the article’s main body of text. Furthermore, I see no real bibliographical sustenance behind Andreescu's attack, which appears biographically-informed and thus verging close to illegitimacy. Clearly Liiceanu's philosophical/intellectual legacy - as one of Paltinis School's main contemporary exponent - should be expounded on! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.76.253.186 (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


 * How's mass marketing of fascist propaganda irrelevant? Wir haben es nicht gewusst would be a very lame excuse for him not knowing what his publishing house did year after year. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

"Andreescu Critique"
If the section should legitimately be deleted, then it needs to be discussed here for consensus first. Arbitrary section blanking gets anti-vandalism reverts, as can be seen from the edit history.

Revent (talk) 08:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)