Talk:Gabriel Nassif

Untitled

 * Corrected the sentence. Fluorhydric 00:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Today's edit is win.

"Gabriel Nassif costs 2 French mana to play and gives all creatures +50/+50 and quad double strike."

It really does.

Possible NPOV violation
I believe the following statement violates the Neutral point of view:

He won the tournament, despite playing a poorly built deck. It is a biased statememnt, without reference. What is "poorly built"? According to who? How can it be poorly built if it won a tournament? Whether or not a deck is poorly built is a matter of opinion, and thus subject to bias. Should this statement be reworded or removed? Flashstorm 22:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That is a POV statement without a source. I've attempted to look for a source that the deck was considered poorly built, but I haven't even found anything about the event yet. Jay32183 23:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * So, perhaps should it be removed until such a source is found? Or a citation needed notice? I'm personally still not convinced that it doesn't violate NPOV. Flashstorm 00:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed it since this is a living person. We can't have Wikipedians belittling his deck building abilities. Jay32183 00:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Update
Biography section could use an update regarding Nassif's recent Pro Tour and Grand Prix wins. Creet (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)