Talk:GamEvac-Combi

Literature
Why? --Александр Мотин (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I think these probably should not be used per WP:MEDRS "Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content" `a5b (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Quite so. They are unreliable sources for medical content per WP:MEDRS. Alexbrn (talk) 03:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Then why the so-called "prohibited primary sources" are used here, for instance?--Александр Мотин (talk) 10:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles follow the WP:PAGs, not precedent. Lots of articles have problems, that is not a reason to make this one problematic too. Alexbrn (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Since you were also editing the Gam-COVID-Vac article, it is very strange to hear this from you --Александр Мотин (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It is not WP:COMPULSORY to correct every article. Alexbrn (talk) 11:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * yeah. yeah--Александр Мотин (talk) 11:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Just another question for you: why are there the so called "prohibited primary sources" in the article about Bolton ? For example a memoir by Bolton "The Room Where It Happened". Thank you. --Александр Мотин (talk) 11:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * No idea. Also you are putting "prohibited primary sources" in quotation marks, but you are only quoting yourself. Looks like trolling. Alexbrn (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Take it easy. Motin seems to fail at grasping the part of WP:MEDRS which requires editors to avoid original researchUchyotka (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

GRLS
Russian drug registry has several records for GamEvac -  - ЛП-006175, ЛП-003390, ЛП-003389, with 3 in "actual" state. Clinical trials ru registry: `a5b (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Notability
Is this vaccine notable enough to be described in the Wikipedia project? `a5b (talk) 01:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The head of the Gamaleya Institute said that Gam-COVID-Vac was based on this and MERS vaccines made by them . Plus lots of other publications about the topic on the internet.--Александр Мотин (talk) 10:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Are there peer reviewed publications about GamEvac-Combi? Wikipedia is not right place to repost russian state sponsored propaganda (or claims by officials) WP:NOTPROPAGANDA / WP:NOTPROMO. `a5b (talk) 05:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * your words about propaganda does not cause anything but a smile --Александр Мотин (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * So there is one smile and zero peer reviewed publications? `a5b (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Then what? --Александр Мотин (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Such a claim as "zero peer-reviewed publications" was supposed to go before whipping out the word "propaganda", which I consider to be a profanity, an insinuation, even. Uchyotka (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)