Talk:Genetic anthropomorphism

sorry for my wording but this article seems plain silly. the meaning of anthropomorphism belongs to the dictionary not the encyclopedia. the subcase of anthropomorphism when it is used in relation to genes, is even less notable just in itself as a theoretical case. now if there was a scietific literature based discussion that concentrates on the genetic anthropomorphism in someones concrete work or works, thet would merit a mention of this affair somwhere on the bottom of the article that deals with that specific person and his specific works and with the specific criticism and/or defense it drew from other notables regarding the use of this geneticall anthropomorphic point of view in some of their arguments.

without all of those concrete cases and citations of accusing of or defending of the use of genetic anthropomorphic line of thought/point of view theres nothing in general that can be said about this topic that would merit anything more than a brief dictionary definition.

therefore this article makes any intelligent creature reading it sad. 89.134.199.32 (talk) 17:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC).