Talk:Genetically encoded voltage indicator

Untitled

 * Evaluation of this article

The lead section has a concise introductory sentence that summarizes what the article is about. While every following section is not detailed in the intro, I believe that the intro sentence is still concise and useful. The lead sentence does not contain information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise.

The article is neutral and is written in a scientific tone, focusing on the known facts rather than speculation or theory.

Most of the sources are backed up, thorough, and current, with authors from all ethnicities and nationalities. The links are also functional. There are a couple links from official websites that are not peer-reviewed journals, however. Some links are not in English, so a translation service may be required.

I believe that the article is clear, organized and easy to read.

There are no images in the article.

There are currently no conversations in the talk page. The article is part of the Wikiproject articles for creation as well as for electrical engineering. We have not discussed this topic in class yet, and we probably will not discuss it because it is a bioengineering device rather than an epigenetic process.

I think that the article's status is that it is a work in progress and can be improved. The information in the article is concise and clear, but it could be elaborated on as more research comes out. I would say that the article is developed based on the current understanding of the topic but will probably need some updating in the future. RG2022 (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)