Talk:Geometric space

Splitting from Euclidean n-space
Is the present topic sufficiently notable to deserve its own article? It used to live buried in Euclidean_n-space. fgnievinski (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The only definition of a geometric space is to be a space in which one can do geometry. So, geometric space must be a redirect to geometry. I’ll revert the split, which could be restored only if there is a consensus for that. D.Lazard (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Support: The topic is clearly articulated in Euclidean_n-space. It can be sourced in several books.      fgnievinski (talk) 03:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * both: the material in Euclidean_n-space should be moved into Geometry, not into a separate article. However, perhaps it would be appropriate to have a Euclidean n space covering the relations among affine, Euclidean and projective geometries. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Support alternative proposal by Chatul. Geometry could definitely use some of this material, and if this page discusses other geometric spaces, it should be in relation to its main topic of Euclidean space. Felix QW (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: This seems largely redundant with Space (mathematics). I don't think we benefit from making a new article out of it. –jacobolus (t) 01:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)