Talk:Getter Robo Armageddon

Untitled
I can understand the split here - one is about the series itself, the other is about the titular robot itself. There's a similar split with Mazinger Z. Most super robot fans are obsessive enough to be able to write two whole articles like this. I don't particularly support or oppose a merger without additional justification. Snarfies 15:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I think there's a need to keep the article on the mecha seperate from the series. The Shin Getter Robo itself makes appearances in multiple Getter Robo shows (3 at the current time), plus 1 video game, and there are differences between the versions (some major, some minor).--Gunbuster 19:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I cannot support the merging of Shin Getter Robo and Getter Robo Armageddon. The two are different series and to merge them would be to confuse newcomers to Go Nagai's work into thinking that they are one and the same. The two are different series and actually different mecha, seeing as one is Getter and the other is Shin Getter. 15:01 GMT Steven Hurrell

Whoever said that Akira Kamiya originally added a "ku" to the Shine Spark attack was wrong. In its first appearance in Getter Robo G Episode 21, it was pronounced "Shine Spark". No "ku" was added to it. Granted, in later installments (most notably the Super Robot Wars series) he sometimes adds "ku" to "Spark". However, it was never some kind of "trademark". Tomokazu Seki pronouncing it "Spark" was in no way breaking some kind of tradition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.80.36.252 (talk) 01:25, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Why was my edit removed?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Getter_Robo_Armageddon&type=revision&diff=802227531&oldid=802072813 I was citing academic sources. The latest, revised edition of The Anime Encyclopedia still features the same information.