Talk:Ghost craters on Mercury

Suggestions from Orlando Guerra
I think you have a great page. Good job. Some suggestions: [1.] I would work on your intro a little. I think the first sentence should emphasize your main topic, which is tectonics on Mercury; [2.] In the picture captions instead of just putting their names maybe you should have a short description of what they are, such as a picture of wrinkle ridges; [3.] Also you may want to link some of your terms to their corresponding wiki page so that people can look them up. This is a great start.

Suggestions Pt. 2
Im assuming you adjusted your topic from tectonics on Mercury to ghost craters? If so everything looked pretty good. The only thing that got me was the term ghost craters. I was really interested when I heard the name and was very curious about it, but you didn't talk much about the name itself. Is it termed that just because of the particular tectonics involved or is it just the name given to lunar maria on mercury? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oguerr1 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions From Kohl
David, I think the page is overall structured well. The intro paragraph could be slightly longer. I also agree with Orlando in that the image would be best suited with a description. Lastly, in the paragraph under ghost craters there could be a little more elaboration on each type of crater.unsigned comment added by Kkoppe2 (talk • contribs), 8 April 2014 (UTC)