Talk:Giampaolo Di Paola

File:Giampaolo Di Paola.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Giampaolo Di Paola.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikileaks cables

According to Wikileaks cables reported by the press, in 2004, when he was chief of the Italian defence staff, Giampaolo Di Paola has allegedly suggested that US Government should by-pass Italian Parliament with regards to the request to move the United States European Command from Stuttgart to Sigonella.

In 2005 he has allegedly suggested the US Government to give absolute priority to the Sigonella Technical Arrangement before 2006 election: in fact, if the post-communists had won those elections - as they actually did, although leaded by prestigious and reliable Romano Prodi - it would have been impossible to keep using Italian military bases unless the TA had not already been signed before. He also allegedly suggested to cover military operations under the hood of the War on Terror.

Sigonella Technical Arrangement has been signed on April 6, 2006, just three days before general elections in Italy: shortly after, christian democrat Romano Prodi became President of the Council of Ministers of Italy and post-communist Massimo D'Alema Foreign Minister of Italy.

Of course Di Paola's alleged behaviour might be (and most likely is) absolutely legal and correct from the point of view of bilateral agreements between USA and Italy (like the Bilateral Infrastructure Agreement signed in 1954, whose text is still secret). Nonetheless in Italy he has been criticised by NATO opponents (generally post-communists and neofascists).

Sources:

• Claudio Gatti (October15, 2011). "L'Italia miglior alleato americano" (in Italian). Il Sole 24 Ore. Retrieved January 14, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
• Ferruccio Sansa (January 5, 2012). "Se il ministro suggerisce: "aggirate il Parlamento"" (in Italian). Il Fatto Quotidiano. Retrieved January 14, 2012.
• Damiano Aliprandi (November 23, 2011). "Monti, il governo dei conflitti d'interesse" (in Italian). AgoraVox. Retrieved January 14, 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Gatti's article ("Italy: US greatest ally") has been also reported in the press archive of Italian Government and Italian Chamber of Deputies. Sansa's article has been reported in the press archive of Italian Chamber of Deputies.

Perhaps few lines should be added to his biography?

Justin occa seawolf (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giampaolo Di Paola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111208071600/http://www.difesa.it:80/SMD/CaSMD/Capi-SMD/Pagine/Giampaolo_DI_PAOLA.aspx to http://www.difesa.it/SMD/CaSMD/Capi-SMD/Pagine/giampaolo_di_paola.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)