Talk:Gilmore Guys

Comment
Can the main editor divide out the episode listings by season?

Perhaps edit the guest column to say "N/A" where applicable. Right now where it's left empty, it seems to be populated with TBA, which is not exactly applicable. I'm not familiar enough with how things work to do the edit myself.GotGlassTubes (talk) 01:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gilmore Guys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150709205046/http://www.atxfestival.com/programming/relive/2015-4/events/ to http://www.atxfestival.com/programming/relive/2015-4/events/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151207020250/http://thebillfold.com:80/2015/12/how-gilmore-guys-do-money/ to http://thebillfold.com/2015/12/how-gilmore-guys-do-money/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150908060808/http://www.atxfestival.com/programming/events/ to http://www.atxfestival.com/programming/events/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Episode guide
Since people keep adding the 158k long episode list back in, this is an edited version of a discussion at the talk page of.

A hundred and fifty eight thousand characters long episode listing is not Wikipedia is for. If you're into Gilmore Guys, feel free to start your own fanpage. It does not belong on Wikipedia.

Please see WP:NOT. WP:LONGTIME, WP:EFFORT, WP:NOHARM and WP:WHATABOUTX are not reasons to keep this stuff. That's not Wikipedia is for. There's no guideline that says "articles about podcasts can be devoted and exhaustive". WP:SIZERULE says every 1,000 characters is 1 kB. >100 kB articles should be split. What I took out was ~ 158 kB of characters alone. If I'd take that gigantic chunk of WP:FANCRUFT material and create a new article, it would be deleted swiftly as it is unsourced, trivial and unencyclopedic.

There's also the WP:BURDEN of reinstating unsourced material. It is on the reverter to add sources, not on the person removing it.

Otherwise there's the option of starting a request for comment, if you want to hear another opinion on the matter. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)