Talk:Giriraj Singh

Sub headers and Controversies
Hello, recently some users have been removing sub sections without getting to a consensus first in the talk page. I've reverted to an older version per WP:STATUSQUO. Would you weigh in? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * So now you are going to recruit editors to edit war for you. Why you are canvassing? You first ask for reason and when reason was provided you started rollback abuse. Don't stonewall over an obvious edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:871:D2C3:C7EE:162F:B744:EF9E (talk) 14:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Both of you (or is it IP sockpuppetry ) have removed the BLP sources template as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I added source by Hindustanlive where it was tagged. Why keep tag when source was just added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:871:D2C3:C7EE:162F:B744:EF9E (talk) 14:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * His caste is not sourced and you didn't provide any policy as per which the subsection headers need to be deleted. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * OK I see now that whole section used to be tagged before. I have added specific tags now to unsourced sentences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:871:D2C3:C7EE:162F:B744:EF9E (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You guys should have worked as per WP:BRD. Changing a long standing layout is against WP:STATUSQUO. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2019 (UTC)