Talk:Gladys Mitchell

Publication
Should the detail of the long, complex and unfolding saga of the publication and "in print" status of Gladys Mitchell's work be separated from the exposition of the work itself - particularly as this information is purely factual? If so, is there a standard Wikipedia scheme for presenting such information? Tim Forcer (talk) 09:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * ORES says C class https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/wp10/803951616 Queen-washington (talk) 18:36, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gladys Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724094454/http://www.minnowpress.co.uk/ to http://www.minnowpress.co.uk/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111208010744/http://www.ruemorguepress.com/catalog.html to http://www.ruemorguepress.com/catalog.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Was she married or not?
The article says "Spouse	Walter Bland" and "Mitchell never married."

Which one is accurate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.26.16.224 (talk) 03:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)