Talk:Gold Dust Twins

Short description
Hi @GenQuest, why do you insist on maintaining a short description that is neither short nor an accurate description of the article topic? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I only insist that there be a short description, there's a whole group of editors for that. Removing one without replacing it is just passing the buck to someone else. Anyway, I'll fix it. Thanks, GenQuest  "scribble" 01:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * What was wrong with the short description I added? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @GenQuest, please take the time to respond. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Nothing. Either is fine. GenQuest  "scribble" 02:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Caricatures
More needs to be added to this page regarding their effects as caricatures and stereotypes from the Jim Crow era. see this article. 66.195.146.66 (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Paywalled. Unhelpful. GenQuest  "scribble" 16:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Paywalled sources are still valid sources. You seem more than a little defensive.  Can you work collaboratively on this? awkwafaba (📥) 18:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you see this source? awkwafaba (📥) 18:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I can. No one here's being defensive.  But I suspect someone might be here to Right Great Wrongs.  Slapping a maintenance tag on an article and then going silent with no explanation—as the IP did—when one can just as easily add findings to a new section of the article seems odd and a bit drama-filled.  Regards,  GenQuest  "scribble" 15:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)