This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Hi @GenQuest, why do you insist on maintaining a short description that is neither short nor an accurate description of the article topic? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I only insist that there be a short description, there's a whole group of editors for that. Removing one without replacing it is just passing the buck to someone else. Anyway, I'll fix it. Thanks, GenQuest"scribble" 01:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What was wrong with the short description I added? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
More needs to be added to this page regarding their effects as caricatures and stereotypes from the Jim Crow era. see this article. 66.195.146.66 (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Paywalled sources are still valid sources. You seem more than a little defensive. Can you work collaboratively on this? awkwafaba (📥) 18:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I can. No one here's being defensive. But I suspect someone might be here to Right Great Wrongs. Slapping a maintenance tag on an article and then going silent with no explanation—as the IP did—when one can just as easily add findings to a new section of the article seems odd and a bit drama-filled. Regards, GenQuest"scribble" 15:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]