Talk:Google Arts & Culture

Impact of recent student edits
This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.

If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.

Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
 * 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
 * 1 - A few minutes of work needed
 * 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
 * 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
 * 4 - More than an hour of work needed

Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Problems seen in this article.
Wrong title despite the change of service name in the lead paragraph:
 * ✅ - Moved page with new title.

Cheers! - Wefk423 (talk) 12:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

cleanup
Regardless of where the spam originated,I removed some of the excessive use of the name of the project and the firm. "It" and "they" are usually good substitutes. I also reduced some wordy or redundant wording--characteristic both of corporate PR, and of group projects. What is most needed now is an update: some of the "future developments" have been realized, and the data on material included dates from 2012, over six years ago.  DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Relation between Google Arts & Culture and Google Cultural Institute
The article is confusing about the relation between the two entities. GCI is listed as an "influence" on GA&C, but that section says that GA&C content was available through GCI years after its launch. Someone how knows more about the topic should look at rephrasing how the two initiatives are described. It might be as simple as moving the GCI out of "Influences" and into another section. "Background"? MartinPoulter (talk) 11:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgetown University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)