Talk:Gran Paradiso National Park

Untitled
This article was started in 2006, how can it be on DYK in 2008? --Gerrit CUTEDH 10:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The DYK rules say that articles that have been expanded fivefold or more can be on DYK. This article was expanded. Bláthnaid  11:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Good article
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

-- Naerii  07:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. By the way, I pushed the POV that ibex are adorable :p Bláthnaid  12:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Disagree. Adorable ibexes are not NPOV but unless it uses emotional language let's leave it.Dave (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

This article is not bad, but I fail to see how it has been awarded both a "good article" and "featured article" status. Compared to the Italian version, which is full of detail, covers many aspects and generally seems excellent (though I have no specialist knowledge) it is very cursory and has one or two statements which do not match the version in Italian. To sum up: there is no justification in awarding stars to the derivative English version when the Italian has none. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.129.105.97 (talk) 11:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Translation
Some of this might be regarded as translated so I put this notice on this page as requested. I notice however that we English-speakers have gone off on our own with this and also have provided many references not in the Italian. Make up your mind, is it translated from the Italian or taken from English references? So I presume that like Britannica-type articles it started as a translation and now has a life of its own. Therefore I put this notification in here as requested but also took out the request for translation on the theory that we are beyond mere translation. I know I plan to expand it and also the refs need proper formatting. I expanded the box a bit and brought it in line with other national park articles. As for the rating, let's just leave it.Dave (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Gran Paradiso National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080510222229/http://sea.unep-wcmc.org:80/sites/pa/0245v.htm to http://sea.unep-wcmc.org/sites/pa/0245v.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gran Paradiso National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66a0NCQe7?url=http://www.pngp.it/ to http://www.pngp.it/page.asp?ART=269%02PGE%3D1%02COD%3DA%02SEL%3D55%02TIT%3DThe%20Park%20environments
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66a0NlTcm?url=http://www.pngp.it/ to http://www.pngp.it/page.asp?ART=275&PGE=1&COD=A&SEL=55&TIT=The%20woods
 * Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66a0OJpRZ?url=http://www.pngp.it/ to http://www.pngp.it/page.asp?ART=272&PGE=1&COD=A&SEL=55&TIT=Rocky%20environments

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)