Talk:Guangzhou South railway station

According to http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=51162773 this is no longer a "future station". It was opened in January 2010. It is said to be the largest train station in Asia.David Fairthorne (talk) 05:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guangzhou South Railway Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.robroad.com/data/2006/0719/article_66103.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150204223444/http://www.southcn.com/news/dishi/guangzhou/shizheng/200412300053.htm/ to http://www.southcn.com/news/dishi/guangzhou/shizheng/200412300053.htm/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:54, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * FMetro logo icon.svg

Adjacent stations and whitespace
There is a huge amount of whitespace in this article as the infobox is too long. It would make sense to me to put the adjacent stations in the article body, but they always render underneath the infobox no matter where I put them in the code. Is there any way to make them render beside the infobox? This would reduce the length and whitespace in this article and make the adjacent stations always visible instead of hidden away. NemesisAT (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @NemesisAT You can use the  parameter to do this. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 10:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Looks much better, imo NemesisAT (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)