Talk:Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America

OBJECTIVE coverage of this book needed!!
"In this book, Coulter dedicated three pages to defending the Council of Conservative Citizens, which she described as a group that stands for "a strong national defense, the right to keep and bear arms, the traditional family, and an 'America First' trade policy," and also labeled critics of the CofCC as liberals who "have no principles". Coulter denied the group was racist, stating that "There is no evidence on its Web page that the modern incarnation of the CCC supports segregation." However, the group opposes interracial marriage, refers to African-Americans as "genetically inferior", and has been described as a "thinly veiled white supremacist organization" by the New York Times.[1]"

Screaming bias. Where is the "neutrality" flag? Or does it not apply to works created by conservatives? 216.54.22.188 (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. This is very biased. Why does the article say that it is a "fact" that Obama was thrown softball questions? That's an opinion, and this article needs to be overhauled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eclecticperson34 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Just curious but, what specifics on their website point to racism? I don't see how "There is no evidence on its Web page that the modern incarnation of the CCC supports segregation." is denying a group as racist. You need a better source than the New York Times if you're claiming to be unbiased. I think you need to revisit your argument. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.57.120.77 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * One blocked school student 11 years ago, an editor with only 11 edits from 8 years ago, and an IP with only the above edit complaining about a mainstream newspaper. Doug Weller  talk 19:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)