Talk:Guinevere Planitia

Looks good, couple of improvements I'd suggest: Jamgreene (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) I'd try to break up the Volcanology section into subsections with the different features.  Big walls of text aren't very reader friendly.
 * 2) You've got a big map of Venus showing the various textures, if you could pinpoint on the map where this quadrangle is located it would be helpful.
 * 3) More internal linking to other Wiki pages.  I had forgotten what exactly a lobate flow was, so if you could link to its Wiki page where lobate flows were referenced it would be a big help.

Improvements on wiki page
Hey Kohl, your page looks pretty good so far. A few improvements: [1] Volcanology section seems a little crowded, if possible, maybe you could break it up into one or two more sections. [2] On the second figure, perhaps you could better explain exactly what it is we are looking at or where the Guinevere Planitia is. [3] For some reason the page is saying this article does not cite any references or sources although I see you have plenty of them, check that out. Looks good though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfox8 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions from Orlando Guerra
Hey Kohl. The article is good; I like it. Some things you could work on are: [1.] Try to link some of your terms to their corresponding wiki page. Some terms I'd probably want to look up to get a better understanding, especially in your volcanism subsection; [2.] your volcanism section had a lot of info, but your terrain section had hardly any. Maybe you could talk a little more about the terrain; and [3.] I assume the big picture is all of Venus. Maybe you could label the general area you were talking about. All in all it looks like a great start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oguerr1 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Map and comments by Graeme Bartlett
Hi, since this is a map region it would make sense to have a map of it showing the major named features. Also the coordinates have a very wide extent, so coordinates of each corner of the rectangle would be good. Instead of all the references being at the end of a section, try to spread them through, after the first sentence that needs that reference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Live Suggestions
Your page looks really good. Lots of information and diagrams to help reinforce your topic. Only thing I could think of a possible improvement is maybe use thumbnails instead of an entire picture? It looks great as is, though. Jamgreene (talk) 01:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions Pt. 2
Hey the page looks really good. Adding all the pictures really help, a lot info on each subject matter is good, and lots of internal links. The only thing that might make it better is to have a small caption under each picture explaining what it is. I know you refer to them within your paragraphs but I think having small captions would help, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oguerr1 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)