Talk:Guinn v. United States

Disfranchisement
This is the correct word; disenfranchisement has an extra syllable that is not needed.--Parkwells (talk) 23:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd recommend coming to a conclusion, and cutting out the extra language. After reading and analyzing the article for several minutes, I still have no idea whether or not it was constitutional. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions (User talk:talk) 18:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Unanimous?
If it was a unanimous decision, the article should say so... AnonMoos (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)