Talk:Gyles v Wilcox

Fair dealing
Is it legally correct / fair to say that this case was instrumental in determining fair use (now associated with the US) without at all mentioning fair dealing? I don't know, just the though occurred to me whilst reading the article so I thought I'd better ask. - Jarry1250 [Humorous? Discuss.] 19:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * None of the sources on Gyles discuss fair dealing; they simply link it to fair abridgement, which they then subsequently link to fair use. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 14:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Outcome of case
I don't think the outcome for the case is correct. The sources don't appear to fully substantiate the claim that the final ruling was that it was an infringement of Gyles' printing rights, and this article says that it was found to be a fair abridgment (more fully discussed in the author's full article linked at the top of the page).--iamseans (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gyles v Wilcox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725200047/http://www.copyrighthistory.org/cgi-bin/kleioc/0010/exec/showScreen/%22uk_1741_im_001_0001.jpg%22 to http://www.copyrighthistory.org/cgi-bin/kleioc/0010/exec/showScreen/%22uk_1741_im_001_0001.jpg%22
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725200056/http://www.copyrighthistory.org/cgi-bin/kleioc/0010/exec/showScreen/%22uk_1741b_im_001_0001.jpg%22 to http://www.copyrighthistory.org/cgi-bin/kleioc/0010/exec/showScreen/%22uk_1741b_im_001_0001.jpg%22
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725200039/http://www.copyrighthistory.org/cgi-bin/kleioc/0010/exec/ausgabeCom/%22uk_1741%22 to http://www.copyrighthistory.org/cgi-bin/kleioc/0010/exec/ausgabeCom/%22uk_1741%22

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)