Talk:HQ-7

Re-wrote & re-formatted the article -- Adeptitus 23:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Added a "citation required" tag for two reasons:
 * This opinion does need a citation.
 * The existence of a long range SAM does not invalidate the need for a shorter one, especially the HQ-9, which is supposedly cursed with a ridiculously high min alt (for a modern long range SAM) of 500m, which would render it rather useless against seaskimmers, and would explain why they are still buying Russian SAMs. Kazuaki Shimazaki 00:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Agreed -- opinion line removed. -- Adeptitus 22:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

HQ-61?
Is the HQ-61 mentioned a typo for HQ-16 HongQi 16? ComputerGeezer (talk) 17:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on HQ-7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060510173545/http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq7naval.asp to http://sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq7naval.asp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060510171553/http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq7.asp to http://sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq7.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Pakistan Army Air Defence Corp HQ-7 SAM.jpg