Talk:Haas F1 Team

Failure of WP:COMMONSENSE
How is it logical that HRD that fields the Truck Series team is not the same HRD that is preparing to field the Formula One team, when they are the same team using the same name owned by the same person? - The Bushranger One ping only 07:21, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I covered this on your talk page, but I will put it here in case anyone else has the same question:


 * A team has three names - the trading name, which is the name the team registers under as a business; the constructor name, which is the name the FIA credits all results to; and the formal name, which is the name the team uses to refer to themselves, usually with title sponsors.


 * The FIA statement refers to the team as "Haas Formula LLC". The most important part here is the "LLC", which means the team is a limited-liability company. That makes "Haas Formula LLC" the team's trading name. The team's constructor name will be "Haas-(engine)", and so "Haas Racing Developments" is the formal name. That name is used as the article title to distinguish it from other racing teams that use the Haas name (ie, Haas Lola, Stewart-Haas Racing, Newman Haas Racing and so on and so forth).


 * The reason why I bring all of this up is because Gene Haas has gone on the record saying that the Formula 1 team will be a completely separate entity to his NASCAR operations. Therefore, we have to consider the team as being run by Haas Formula LLC, even though WP:COMMONNAME dictates that the article title is Haas Racing Developments.


 * With that in mind, when it comes to the #00 truck, it might be entered under the name "Haas Racing Developments", but that Haas Racing Developments is not the same as this Haas Racing Developments unless it can be demonstrated that truck #00 is being entered and operated by Haas Formula LLC, using Haas Formula LLC assets.


 * That might sound pedantic, but if the truck is not being entered by this team, then it is misleading to include that content. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Haas Disambiguation
I created a disambiguation page for Haas F1 take a look if you think its needed. Speedy Question Mark (talk) 17:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Personally I'm not convinced it's needed, but I don't think it's doing any harm. In future it might be better to ask before creating a page, so that if consensus is that it's not needed, it doesn't need to be deleted. DH85868993 (talk) 10:38, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

"ongoing legal issues"
about the sentence:
 * On July 20, 2019, Lightning Volt (formally Rich Energy) announced that branding for Lightning Volt will not be present on the Haas cars for the German Grand Prix, citing ongoing legal issues.[40]

the source is an article on an obscure blog that simply repost a tweet for a (parody?) account "LightningVoltF1", self-claimed "Official Twitter Account" without blue verified badge. --valepert (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I've removed it as they were entered with Rich Energy and carried the rich energy name on their cars. SSSB (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Wrong undo
Sorry for the mistake I made in the undo. Please fix the vandalized page. Thanks! A Mitzikarl A • Let's talk • — Preceding undated comment added 14:18, 24 January 2021‎

Page needs Semi-Protected status. Vandalism prevalent
This page is being rapidly edited with unconstructive and destructive edits. Semi-Protected status should be applied immediately.

Xprts (talk) 09:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment – A request has already been made at WP:RPP. The timeliness of the protection will depend on admin activity, so until one is available to apply protections, the only course of action is to revert any vandalism. Zappa⚡Matic 09:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: such requests can't be made here but should be made at WP:RPP. SSSB (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Uralkali drop
Recently Haas announced it will drop the Uralkali branding. It should be included here somewhere, but I think it should be discussed first. What words to use and what section to put it in etc. Klrfl (talk) 07:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)


 * It should be in the 2022 section and the wording should be something along the lines of "Haas dropped the branding of Uralkali during pre-season testing, citing the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine." SSSB (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * FIA Flag.svg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * MoneyGram Haas F1 Team logo 2023.png