Talk:Hagley Hall

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hagley Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150419211615/http://www.theenglishhome.co.uk/inspiring-people/guardians-of-history/the_guardians_of_hagley_hall_1_2307420 to http://www.theenglishhome.co.uk/inspiring-people/guardians-of-history/the_guardians_of_hagley_hall_1_2307420

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Bella
I am again reverting the reference to the body found on the estate during the 1940s. This article is about Hagley Hall, as is stated clearly in the lede, and so it is WP:OFFTOPIC. Hagley Wood is not even part of the adjoining Hagley Park but lies beyond its boundary. The Lyttelton estate owns land for miles all round the area and to include every fortuitous event that happens on it as related to the Hall would be plainly stupid. And if the repeated insistance on the fact is meant to suggest that Lord Cobham (the owner of Hagley Hall) had some connection with the murder, that would be actionable. There is already a Wikipedia article about the murder and it has also been referenced in the article on Wychbury Obelisk, site of graffiti relating to it. That is enough. Sweetpool50 (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * In case you haven't noticed the article includes a lengthy section titled "grounds", and discusses the obelisk. This is far from "off topic"; and if you're going to cite WP:OFFTOPIC, please first read and understand it; it suggests we include links to related articles. Your "repeated insistance" [sic] claim is a straw man. While WP:ANI exists for "actionable" issues, I think you're bluffing. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Far from bluffing, I'm prepared to bring it up for open discussion, or for you to do so. I suggest you read carefully the opening sentence of WP:OFFTOPIC. Assuming bad faith is not the kind of behaviour expected of administrators. Sweetpool50 (talk) 16:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)