Talk:Halyna Kuzmenko/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 15:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Copyvio check - no issues with online sources found when using Earwig's Copyvio detector.


 * There are several duplicate links. (MOS:DUPLINK - I use the duplinks-alt sidebar tool linked there to check for these.) Examples: Red Army, Poland, Galicia, Kyiv.
 * Removed the above-mentioned duplicate links. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There are some more: Ukrainian language, Nestor Makhno, Revolutionary Insurgent Army
 * Removed. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Biography
 * Lead has 'Agafya "Halyna"' but the body has just 'Halyna'. I don't have access to the Patterson source, how is Kuzmenko's name given there?
 * She's commonly known as "Halyna". The name "Agafya" was her given name at birth. Patterson 2020 mostly uses simply "Halyna", but in the case of her birth it says "Agaﬁa (Halyna) Andriivna Kuzmenko was born 9 January 1897 in Kyiv." How should I rectify this? --Grnrchst (talk) 16:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest either a referenced footnote giving her birth name, or amending the body text to something like something like "...Agafya Andriivna Kuzmenko, later known as Halyna Andriivna Kuzmenko, was born in Kyiv..."
 * Resolved using the latter option. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Revolutionary activities
 * "Like her new husband, who was commonly known throughout southern Ukraine as Batko (English: Father), Kuzmenko was bestowed the honorific of Matushka" - needs a slight tweak to show that her huband didn't also have the honorific Matushka (e.g. Kuzmenko was bestowed an honorific, Matushka"
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I think that it would be helpful to summarise briefly what Makhnovshchina was.
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Exile
 * "she was given the cold shoulder" seems a bit informal
 * Rectified. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Controversy around alleged diary
 * No issues.

References/Bibliography/Further reading
 * What makes the translation of Kontrrazvedka by Archibald a reliable source? Judging by their website, Black Cat Press seems to be primarily a print shop.
 * If you're worried about the reliability of Azarov 2008, then I'm more than happy to remove it. The only times it is cited in the text is alongside the more clearly reliable Sysyn 1977, so nothing of value would be lost in its removal. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * In that case, I'd prefer it's removed. It may well be a good source but removal seems the easier option. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed. -- Grnrchst (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

--Grnrchst (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Spot checks on "a number of teachers from her own hometown even being executed by the Red Army for their Makhnovist sympathies" (Skirda) - OK.
 * Excerpt from Skirda 2004, p. 318: "In a civilian capacity, a number of teachers took part in the Makhnovist movement and in its social and economic organizational ventures. Some of them paid dearly for this; Galina Kuzmenko quotes the case of the brothers Yefim and Daniel Marutsenko, as well as Daniel's wife - all three teachers in Pestshanybrod, the town where Galina was born - who were shot by the Reds in the summer of 1919 on account of their Makhnovist beliefs."

--Grnrchst (talk) 09:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Spot check on "During this period, the couple frequently argued and Makhno even accused Kuzmenko of having had an affair with their co-defendant Ivan Khmara" (Darch 2020) also OK. (Like with the Skirda check, page numbers are different, as different editions were checked.)
 * Excerpt from Darch 2020, pp. 137-138: "It seems that Makhno’s relationship with Kuz’menko had deteriorated under the strain of such events, with frequent quarrels, during which he accused her of having an affair with Khmara. The Russian historian Golovanov writes of her that: "There was no peace in her, but there was unremitting passion and an explosive personality – just the woman needed for the years of struggle. When the war ended, her relationship with Makhno went bad, and, although she bore him a daughter, the family fell apart. They split up and reunited; she had affairs … in public [Makhno’s] wife was often harsh with him, and it seemed … that she had never loved him, and ended up with him only because she was flattered to be the wife of the most powerful chieftain in Ukraine. He, oddly enough, was a faithful husband … even though at the height of his fame he could have taken any lover.""


 * Further reading: You could add a 'trans-title=' parameter for works with titles in languages other than English, if one isn't already populated.
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Further reading: Looks like there are no easily-findable further details for the Chop item. (No action required here.)
 * Found further details and added. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest using IABot to prevent WP:LINKROT
 * Ran IABot analysis but no modifications were made. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead
 * I think that it would be helpful to summarise briefly what Makhnovshchina was here too.
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The comma after "in 1921" seems to make the sentence a bit choppy, but it's optional to remove it.
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Images
 * Placement and captions are OK. Although MOS:ACCIM says "Avoid placing images on the left hand side as a consistent left margin makes reading easier.", the number of images used, which add to the article's value, mean that having some on the left seems a better option here.
 * alt text could be added per MOS:ALT. I received some useful guidance about Alt text at Peer review/Fatima Whitbread/archive1
 * Added alt text. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

A very interesting article,. Thanks for your efforts. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reviewing this! --Grnrchst (talk) 10:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm satisfied that the article meets the GA criteria, so am passing it. Nice work, . Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)