Talk:Hande Yener

Fair use rationale for Image:ApayriHandeYener.jpg
Image:ApayriHandeYener.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NasilDelirdimHandeYener.jpg
Image:NasilDelirdimHandeYener.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Handeyener-maxisingle.jpg
Image:Handeyener-maxisingle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Handeyener extra.jpg
Image:Handeyener extra.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Hayrola?
Hande has a new album, called "Hayrola?" Could someone enter that in the charts? I've tried (since it was wrongly done anyohow, the album is now being placed behind the cd "Hipnoz"), but I failed in doing it right also. (someone has to let me know how these charts work :)) Big thnx! --Robster1983 (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Never Mind, I found out myself. :) Additional information (about the album) would be nice, though. :)--Robster1983 (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

This page is not a commercial ad!
People, as much as I love Hande, this page must be as objective as possible. It seems to me that some people create a raving review of every album Hande is releasing. Whether she deserves it or not, that's not the point here! Try to keep on subject! If an album has 10 tracks, then een album has 10 tracks, not "everey track from the 10 tracks are great". If an album is electropop, then the album is electropop, not "an album to be a guaranteed hit before you are going out/ having a night on the town". Capiche? I will follow this page, and if I see that this page has been 'molested' again, I am going to ask for (semi)protection, for this page cannot, and should not, be one giant advertisement for Hande. --Robster1983 (talk) 16:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Couldn't agree more. I love Hande as much as the next fan (not that we number very many here in England) but some objectivity ought to be borne in mind when compiling any Wikipedia article. CLH Scott, 7 October 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.161.102.174 (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * To be honest the page still needs some work. This is an encyclopedia, not some fan-rag.


 * Oh please! A "groovy disco sound".  God preserve us!  Skinsmoke (talk) 23:32, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

"Edit request"
First of all in response to the unsigned user 212.1616.102.174: thanx! It is nice to know that some people who love Hande (whether in the Netherlands or in the UK) still have some sort of objectivity. :D Second: I changed the figures of Hande's sales of "Hayrola?" to 37,000 (again!). I've added a source with that (I've even been active on the Turkish wikipedia article for this). However, someone keeps messing on this page, and changes it back to 100,000. It's not that I don't like to see Hande selling so much cds, cause I do (I love Hande!). But people, add the sources that can prove it! Since this seems to be some sort of edit-war with some anonimous user (82.217.58.253), I have added a silver-protection. If the page is still being molested, then I will ask for a level of protection going further than the silver one. Just to be clear: I hope that people don't let it come to that, and keep this page objective; i.e. adding the sources! :) So people, you know what to do: if you know that Hande has sold that much cds, add the prove, and it is here to stay! :)--Robster1983 (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Padlock-silver-slash2.svg Not done: is not required for edits to semi-protected, unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. -- &#47; MWOAP &#124;  Notify Me &#92; 23:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Padlock-dash2.svg Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Requests for page protection. -- &#47; MWOAP &#124; Notify Me &#92; 23:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Only Admins can semi-protect (silver protect) pages. You also with this request have requested an edit by a confirmed or autoconfirmed user because this page is semi-protected, yet it is not. This might explain some of the things I am saying in more detail. -- &#47; MWOAP &#124; Notify Me &#92; 23:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hande Yener. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101104213136/http://www.pollproduction.com/v2/ to http://www.pollproduction.com/v2/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120309040000/http://www.tulumba.com/storeItem.asp?ic=MU935984GI819 to http://www.tulumba.com/storeItem.asp?ic=MU935984GI819

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC)