Talk:Hanna–Honeycomb House

This article is almost exactly a copy of the article it references!
Is this plagiarism? A violation of copyright? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlowery (talk • contribs) 05:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC).
 * Yes to the first, no to the second. The original source is the National Parks Service, a US federal government agency. Works of the US federal government are in the public domain. Thus, no copyright infringement. But, I just did add some more info from an old Stanford news article (which is copyrighted, so that I had to summarize).  howcheng  {chat} 05:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The "NPS" tag suggesting someone was proud that the article incorporated text from a National Park Service website is a clear indication that the article is plagiarized. I suppose if it is plagiarized, it is better to acknowledge that than not.  The article is now a mess, a mixture of plagiarized text and newly written text.  I am inclined to blank it out and start over, although that would lose some new written text.  I marked it with "refimprove" tag for the moment, may return to blank it all out. doncram (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hanna–Honeycomb House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114222931/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1749&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1749&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)