Talk:Happy99

Keep the article
The article may not be adequately sourced, but Happy99 was a very significant virus, many people receiving multiple copies in email, and as such, the article should not be tagged for deletion. Eauhomme (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

From the Wikipedia notability guidelines, "notability is not temporary," so as long as Happy99 once was once notable it remains notable even 10 years later. I beleive this worm received signifcant press coverage at the time although I do not have a good source for this. Happy99 was considered notable enough to have an entry in the Timeline of notable computer viruses and worms article. Vote: This is notable, keep. 209.90.142.18 (talk) 06:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have added a number of media reports and revised the technical details. ←  Spidern  →  14:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Happy99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060914091249/http://etd-submit.etsu.edu/etd/theses/available/etd-0715103-211816/unrestricted/GroverA071803f.pdf to http://etd-submit.etsu.edu/etd/theses/available/etd-0715103-211816/unrestricted/GroverA071803f.pdf
 * Added tag to http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-101463.html?legacy=zdnn
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050221013855/http://www.viruslist.com/en/viruses/encyclopedia?virusid=22314 to http://www.viruslist.com/en/viruses/encyclopedia?virusid=22314

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)