Talk:Harefield Pit
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in London may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
[Untitled][edit]
. There is no photo of the site as it is hidden from the road. If anyone can get a photo, please upload to Commons and this article - or ask for help on this page if you do not know how to do that. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Recent edits[edit]
I do not see the point of the recent edits, which revise correct text. "amounts to" is an odd phrase and implies that it is the whole quarry whereas "located in" correctly implies that the SSSI is only part of the quarry. Adding "may be" wrongly implies that Natural England is not definite, and changing "Reading Beds" to "strata" wrongly implies that the comment applies to the whole site. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Located is a disgusting word used by estate agents. See filler in style. It adds nothing. Since when is Natural England 100% definite? And Reading Beds is just one of the hidden strata.- Adam37 Talk 20:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Your revision corrects the errors which I pointed out, but your comments here and especially in your revert comment breach Wikipedia:Civility. Wikipedia is supposed to be a cooperative enterprise avoiding hostile and insulting language. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)