Talk:Hate It or Love It

Fair use rationale for Image:HateItOrLoveIt.png
Image:HateItOrLoveIt.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Hate It or Love It (remix) merge
i don't think it shud b merged, it is a completely different song and was an official remix so it shud get its own article withs it own infobox - keep it real - Real Compton G - Holla back 17:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

hmmm... Hard to say, but IMO it should own it's article as they are different to each other. --West Coast Ryda and Talk to Me 18:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Should be kept seperate, makes articles look awkward with two infoboxes and then what cats is it going to go in afte rmerge? --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   18:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Probably should be merged, it's a remix, it would be pointless to have two separate pages if you can fit both of them on the same page. It's not that big of an article either. It doesn't look awkward with two infoboxes, that's your POV, I've seen other pages with two infoboxes which are just fine. They are different, so they can have different sections, it's not a completely different song, it has the same beat, and it pretty much talks about the same thing, it's just a remix that's notable enough to be mentioned. Also, I don't understand what The-G-Unit-Boss asked regarding the categories. --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 19:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge. Just like most other songs, unless it was extremely popular, it does not warrant its own article. Many covers and remixes are featured on the same article page, often with two infoboxes. ♠ SG →Talk 00:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I disagree, i think it should have it's own page as it was an official remix and i think it looks kinda crap when a page has 2 infoboxes - keep it real - Real Compton G - Holla back 18:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

No Merge - I think it looks shitty when a page has 2 infoboxes --Brooklyn Soldier 20:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The pages shouldn't be merged as there two different songs.--Shadyaftrmathgunit 21:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge. - A remix is often derived from the original song, which, of course, is the case here. Besides, I don't think the page should have two separate sections/infoboxes for the original and the remix (a 'remixes' section already exists). Keep it tidy. Hoodie 07:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hate It or Love It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006172259/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/review.php?ID=2696 to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/review.php?ID=2696
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150926191951/http://www.mtv.com/bands/v/news_feature_vma_noms05/vma05list_flat.jhtml to http://www.mtv.com/bands/v/news_feature_vma_noms05/vma05list_flat.jhtml
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6JBCW5Wkj?url=http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hate It or Love It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080629004951/http://music.ign.com/articles/584/584934p2.html to http://music.ign.com/articles/584/584934p2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:54, 1 January 2018 (UTC)