Talk:Hatf-I

January 26 2006

 * Talk:Hatf-I/Hatf-IA — Hatf-I/Hatf-IA → Hatf-I/IA/IB – I forgot the Hatf IB Missile Ali 786 03:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hatf-I.jpg
Image:Hatf-I.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Renaming the article from Hatf-I/IA to Hatf-I
Hatf-IA is an upgrade of Hatf-I missile. This fact is mentioned in the article. There is no need to mention it in the title. The missile system is commonly called Hatf-I and that should be the title of the article. The slash does not look nice in a title. Since it is a noncontroversial move, I have used the move command without requesting the move; using the rational below.
 * ==Requesting uncontroversial moves==
 * If the move you are suggesting is uncontroversial and technically possible, please feel free to move the page yourself. Moves are possible (for registered users with accounts over four days old) when the desired name is a red link, or in cases where the target is a simple redirect—a redirect to the current title, with no prior versions in its edit history. After moving a page, update its text to reflect the new title.


 * If there has been any past debate about the best title for the page, or if the page has recently been moved in good faith, or if anyone could honestly disagree with the move, then treat it as controversial. Otherwise, post your request in the Uncontroversial proposals section of this page.


 * If the only obstacle to an uncontroversial move is a navigation aid (e.g. a redirect or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history), the template db-move can be used instead to have that page deleted under criterion for speedy deletion G6.


 * {Raza0007 | Talk} 09:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)