Talk:Heads Up (The Walking Dead)

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 November 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

"suggesting he admits the failures of his previous plan"[edit]

This parenthetical comment in the plot summary is speculation violating Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. It also is an odd claim because the only "failure" of his plan was not accounting for a loud air horn coming from Alexandria and lasting for a few minutes, hardly something that can be blamed on poor planning. I will delete the parenthetical and add a note in the edit summary for people to come talk about it here if they disagree. 142 and 99 (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

: Ah, that was my bad. You're absolutely right for removing that [[1]]. I feel like there's something to be said there but I'll have to try to cite outside articles and find an appropriate way to present such information (ie: not under *plot*).Reidgreg (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]